The Death of Jacob and Joseph

Log in to take the quiz and save your progress.

1. Observe

   What fear did the brothers have after Jacob's death, and how did Joseph respond?

   • The brothers feared Joseph would sell them back into slavery as punishment; Joseph assured them he had no legal authority to punish them without Pharaoh's approval
   • The brothers feared Joseph had only held back revenge because of Jacob's presence, and now might retaliate; Joseph wept at their fear and said "Am I in the place of God?" then reassured them and promised provision
   • The brothers feared being expelled from Goshen now that their political connection through Joseph might end; Joseph reassured them about their land rights
   • The brothers fabricated a message claiming Jacob had requested forgiveness on their behalf before dying; Joseph saw through this but forgave them anyway

2. Observe

   What were Joseph's dying instructions, and what do they reveal about his faith?

   • Joseph instructed his sons to return to Canaan after the famine and rebuild the family's holdings there
   • Joseph said God would surely bring the children of Israel out of Egypt to the promised land, and he made them swear to carry his bones with them — a dying act of faith in a future he could not see
   • Joseph appointed Ephraim as his successor in Egypt and requested burial in Goshen alongside the rest of Jacob's family
   • Joseph gave detailed administrative instructions for managing the grain stores and protecting the family's position after his death

3. Interpret

   Joseph says "Am I in the place of God?" when his brothers ask for forgiveness. What does this question reveal about how Joseph understood his own role in their story?

   • The question was a rhetorical refusal to judge them — Joseph was saying he had no legal authority over them
   • Joseph recognized that vengeance belongs to God alone, and that his role was not to be their judge but to be an instrument of God's provision — punishing them would be claiming a role that was not his
   • The question reflects Joseph's Egyptian education — in Egyptian theology, only Pharaoh could pronounce final judgment on others
   • Joseph was expressing ongoing uncertainty about whether to forgive — he had not fully resolved whether the brothers deserved punishment

4. Interpret

   "You meant evil against me, but God meant it for good." How does this statement hold together human responsibility and divine sovereignty without canceling either?

   • The statement resolves the tension by showing God's purpose was so overwhelming that the brothers' evil became essentially irrelevant and cannot be counted against them
   • Both human evil intent and divine good purpose were simultaneously real — the brothers were genuinely responsible for evil; God was genuinely working good through it; both statements are true at the same time
   • The statement places primary weight on divine sovereignty and effectively minimizes human accountability — what God purposes cannot ultimately be counted as human sin
   • Joseph's theological framework was his personal way of coping and may not represent normative biblical theology about the interaction of human and divine agency

5. Apply

   The brothers feared that Joseph's forgiveness was conditional on Jacob's presence — still living as if unforgiven. Is there a relationship where you have received forgiveness but still live with the fear that it might be revoked?

   • If forgiveness has been clearly offered and accepted, ongoing fear is simply a psychological issue unrelated to the actual state of the relationship
   • Living as if unforgiven when forgiveness has been genuinely offered reveals a failure to receive grace fully — and this has practical consequences for the relationship and for our freedom
   • The brothers' fear was reasonable given Joseph's power over them — some levels of caution in formerly broken relationships are prudent, not faithless
   • The lesson here is primarily about Joseph's patience in extending reassurance, not about the brothers' need to receive forgiveness more fully

6. Apply

   Joseph died with confident hope in a future he would not see — the Exodus, the promised land. What promises of God are you holding on to that will not be fulfilled in your lifetime, and how does Joseph's example encourage you to hold them faithfully?

   • Promises not fulfilled in our lifetime are peripheral matters of eschatology and should not be the primary focus of faith in daily life
   • Faith that holds promises across generations — remaining confident in what God has said even when we will not see it — is a mark of mature faith that anchors present obedience in future hope
   • Joseph's confidence in the Exodus was based on specific prophetic revelation given to him; believers without such specific revelation should hold the future more loosely
   • The primary application is about legacy — making arrangements so our descendants can fulfill what we cannot, as Joseph did by specifying his bones

Your journal

Write your own answers — they save automatically, and only you can see them.

Log in to write and save journal answers.