Abram and Lot Separate

Log in to take the quiz and save your progress.

1. Observe

   What caused the conflict between Abram and Lot, and how did Abram propose to resolve it?

   • Lot's servants were stealing from Abram; Abram proposed that Lot leave the region entirely
   • The land could not support both their flocks; Abram generously offered Lot the first choice of any direction
   • Lot wanted to return to Egypt; Abram insisted they stay in Canaan and offered Lot the southern land
   • Abram's servants and Lot's servants argued over water rights; Abram proposed building a boundary wall

2. Observe

   On what basis did Lot choose the Jordan plain, and what ominous note does the narrator immediately add?

   • Lot chose it because God directed him there; the narrator notes it was actually less fertile than it appeared
   • Lot chose it because it looked well-watered and lush — like the garden of God; the narrator immediately notes the men of Sodom were exceedingly wicked
   • Lot chose the Jordan plain to stay near Abram; the narrator notes a drought was coming to the region
   • Lot chose the mountain region to the east; the narrator notes the Canaanites in that region were hostile

3. Interpret

   Abram gave Lot the first choice of land even though, as the elder and the covenant-holder, the choice was rightfully his. What does this act reveal about how faith reshapes decision-making?

   • Abram was indifferent to which land he received, since he knew both were equally good
   • Faith freed Abram from the need to secure the best outcome for himself — he could be generous because God, not the land, was his true security
   • Abram gave Lot the choice as a test to see whether Lot would choose wisely or selfishly
   • Abram's generosity was purely strategic — he expected the better land to be on his preferred side anyway

4. Interpret

   God reaffirmed and expanded his covenant promises to Abram immediately after Lot separated from him (vv. 14-17). Why might the timing of this renewal be significant?

   • God waited until Abram was alone to speak privately, as he preferred not to address both men at once
   • The expansion of the promise came after an act of faith and generosity — God's confirmation followed Abram's trust-filled release of his rights
   • God renewed the promise because Abram had been doubting it since returning from Egypt
   • The timing was coincidental — God had planned to speak regardless of what Abram did with Lot

5. Apply

   Lot chose by sight — the land looked like Eden and Egypt. Abram chose by faith, letting Lot pick first and trusting God. What does this contrast reveal about the different ways people approach major decisions?

   • That visible evidence is always misleading and believers should ignore it entirely when making decisions
   • That the criteria we use to evaluate options — sight vs. faith, short-term vs. long-term, self-interest vs. trust in God — shape the outcomes of our choices far more than the options themselves
   • That Lot was simply greedy and lacked Abram's moral character, making this a story about personal virtue
   • That God always provides the better option to those who let others choose first

6. Apply

   After returning from Egypt and resolving the conflict with Lot, Abram went back to the altar he had built earlier and called on Yahweh's name (vv. 3-4). What does returning to a place of worship after failure and conflict suggest about spiritual recovery?

   • That physical locations have special spiritual power that can restore a person's relationship with God
   • That recovering spiritual footing often involves returning to the habits and patterns of worship that were in place before the failure
   • That Abram was trying to undo his sin in Egypt by performing additional religious acts
   • That believers should keep detailed records of where they have worshipped so they can return there

Your journal

Write your own answers — they save automatically, and only you can see them.

Log in to write and save journal answers.