Arrival in Jerusalem and Paul's Arrest

Log in to take the quiz and save your progress.

1. Observe

   What did the prophet Agabus do to illustrate his prophecy about Paul's fate in Jerusalem?

   • He drew a picture of chains on a scroll and handed it to Paul
   • He fell to the ground as if dead and said "so Paul will fall"
   • He took Paul's belt, bound his own hands and feet, and said the Jews at Jerusalem would bind Paul and deliver him to the Gentiles
   • He broke a clay jar and said "so will Jerusalem break Paul"

2. Observe

   What false accusation led the crowd to seize Paul in the temple and begin beating him?

   • That he had stolen from the temple treasury
   • That he had spoken blasphemy against Caesar in the temple courts
   • That he had taught Jews everywhere to forsake Moses and had brought a Greek named Trophimus into the temple
   • That he had led a group of Gentile converts in a ceremony inside the inner court

3. Interpret

   The Holy Spirit warned Paul of suffering ahead through disciples in Tyre (v. 4) and through Agabus in Caesarea (vv. 10-11), yet Paul pressed on anyway. How does this complicate a simple equation that God's leading always equals comfort and safety?

   • Paul was acting in disobedience by ignoring the Spirit's warnings.
   • The warnings were not from the Spirit but from the disciples' own anxiety about losing Paul.
   • God's guidance sometimes leads directly into suffering rather than around it; the Spirit's warnings were not stop signs but preparation — God informing Paul of what lay ahead so he could go in with open eyes rather than false expectations. Paul's phrase "bound by the Spirit to Jerusalem" (Acts 20:22) reveals that the same Spirit who predicted the suffering was also the one compelling him forward. Divine leading and divine warning of suffering are not contradictory.
   • Paul was right to ignore the warnings because God always protects his servants from physical harm.

4. Interpret

   James advised Paul to join four men in a Nazirite purification rite to demonstrate that he still respected the law (vv. 20-26). Paul complied. Was this pastoral compromise or wise accommodation?

   • It was a compromise that contradicted Paul's teaching in Galatians about freedom from the law.
   • It was full obedience to the Jerusalem Council's decree requiring Jewish Christians to keep the law.
   • It was a strategic accommodation: James and the elders were not requiring the rite for salvation but asking Paul to remove an unnecessary offense so that Jewish Christians could continue hearing the gospel. Paul had taught that Jews could live as Jews and Gentiles as Gentiles; participating in a temple rite was consistent with his own principle of becoming "all things to all people" (1 Cor 9:20-23). The tragedy is that even this concession did not prevent the riot.
   • Paul had no choice since he was under James's authority as head of the Jerusalem church.

5. Apply

   The disciples in Caesarea, after hearing Agabus's prophecy, wept and begged Paul not to go — and eventually yielded with "the Lord's will be done" (v. 14). Where in your life is God calling you to release someone you love into a costly path of obedience?

   • Accepting suffering in others' lives is only required of those who have reached spiritual maturity.
   • If the community of believers agrees someone should not go, that consensus overrides individual calling.
   • The disciples' journey from grief to surrender models the hardest kind of prayer: wanting to protect someone we love while ultimately yielding to God's larger purposes. "The Lord's will be done" is not resignation but active trust — placing a beloved person into God's hands rather than our own. The willingness to say that phrase and mean it is one of the deepest acts of faith in the NT.
   • This passage teaches that prophetic warnings should always redirect us from dangerous paths.

6. Apply

   Paul was willing to be misunderstood and maligned by the very Jewish Christians in Jerusalem he most wanted to honor (vv. 20-28). Where might following Jesus require you to be misread or maligned by people whose approval you value most?

   • Seeking the approval of fellow believers is always wrong and should be avoided.
   • If we are misunderstood, it means we have failed to communicate our intentions clearly enough.
   • Paul's situation was exceptional; modern believers should not expect to be misunderstood by other Christians.
   • The community whose approval Paul most craved — his Jewish kinsmen and the Jerusalem church — was the very community that became the occasion of his arrest; faithfulness sometimes means accepting that people we love and respect will read our motives incorrectly. The question is whether our identity is finally rooted in what God has called us to do or in what others think of us — Paul's arrest-from-the-steps answer is clear.

Your journal

Write your own answers — they save automatically, and only you can see them.

Log in to write and save journal answers.