A History of Rebellion

Log in to take the quiz and save your progress.

1. Observe

   When the elders of Israel come to inquire of God in verse 1, what is God's response (v. 3)?

   • God answers them with a vision of the future restoration
   • God refuses to be inquired of by them and instead retells the history of Israel's rebellion
   • God tells Ezekiel to give them a message of immediate repentance
   • God welcomes their inquiry and gives instructions for reform

2. Observe

   According to verses 11-12, what two things did God give Israel in the wilderness?

   • The land of Canaan and the covenant of circumcision
   • His statutes and ordinances, and his Sabbaths as a sign between them
   • The tabernacle design and the priestly order
   • The ark of the covenant and the manna from heaven

3. Interpret

   The phrase "for my name's sake" appears repeatedly as God's reason for restraining judgment (vv. 9, 14, 22). What does it mean theologically that God's mercy toward Israel was grounded in his own character and reputation rather than Israel's merit?

   • It means God's mercy was ultimately self-serving and had little to do with genuine love for Israel.
   • It means Israel had no responsibility because everything depended on God's name anyway.
   • It means God's faithfulness was conditional on Israel's performance — he would act when they improved.
   • God's mercy grounded in his own name means that his faithfulness cannot be derailed by human failure — it is anchored in who God is, not in what Israel deserves. This is simultaneously humbling and reassuring: humbling because it removes any claim of merit, and reassuring because it means the covenant does not ultimately depend on the partner who keeps breaking it. God's reputation is inseparable from his commitment to his people, so even their failure cannot make him abandon them entirely — though it cannot make him ignore their sin.

4. Interpret

   God declares he will bring Israel into a "wilderness of the peoples" (v. 35) — a second exodus — and will "cause you to pass under the rod" and purge the rebels before bringing the remnant into the land. How is this future restoration different from a simple rescue or return?

   • The second exodus is merely a repeat of the first, with no new elements.
   • The second exodus is a purely spiritual metaphor and has no connection to a physical return.
   • The restoration will come without any purging — God will accept all the exiles indiscriminately.
   • God's future restoration involves active refining: the wilderness becomes a place of judgment where those who remain in rebellion are separated from those who turn. This is not simply rescue from exile but transformation through discipline — a reconstitution of the people rather than a restoration of the status quo. The remnant that enters the land will be one that has passed through God's rod, which is why the restoration will actually hold rather than immediately cycling back into the same pattern of rebellion.

5. Apply

   Israel's history shows the same pattern repeating across multiple generations: rebellion, grace, restraint "for my name's sake," and renewed rebellion. How do you respond to recognizing a repeated pattern in your own spiritual life?

   • Repeated failure proves that change is impossible and expectation of growth should be abandoned.
   • The only appropriate response is intense shame, which motivates genuine change.
   • Repeated patterns in the spiritual life are purely habitual — they simply need better behavioral strategies to break.
   • Recognizing a cycle is the beginning of wisdom — it names the pattern that was previously invisible. God's persistence through Israel's repeated failures "for his name's sake" means he does not abandon the project of transformation even when cycles repeat. The appropriate response is honest naming of the pattern, repentance that goes deeper than behavior to the underlying trust issue, and receiving grace not as permission to repeat but as fuel for genuine change that the cycle itself has shown is beyond willpower alone.

6. Apply

   The elders came to "inquire of Yahweh" while still practicing idolatry and child sacrifice (vv. 31-32). God refused to be consulted under those conditions. What does this reveal about the difference between seeking God's endorsement and genuinely seeking God's direction?

   • God always answers sincere seekers regardless of their current behavior, since judging motive is impossible.
   • The elders were simply confused about proper ritual — adjusting the ceremony would have solved the problem.
   • Going to a prophet is always sufficient to satisfy the requirement of seeking God.
   • Genuine inquiry of God requires openness to correction and willingness to let go of what God is opposing — otherwise it is not inquiry but lobbying. The elders wanted divine guidance while keeping their idols; they wanted God's wisdom without God's lordship. When you come to God while holding firmly to what you know he opposes, you are not seeking his will but seeking his endorsement for your own. The measure of genuine seeking is whether you are prepared for the answer to require something from you.

Your journal

Write your own answers — they save automatically, and only you can see them.

Log in to write and save journal answers.